I was at the store and just grabbed a hanger pack. It said it was guaranteed to have two of the Mookie Betts inserts, so I thought why not?
Here are the Red Sox:
In half the number of cards, I pulled two more Red Sox cards than the previous blasters. That was pretty damn impressive. On top of the base cards of Pearce, Benintendi, and Leon, I pulled two of the Mookie inserts, a Ted Williams Iconic card reprint, and the best card of the lot: a Mookie Betts insert that also had the 150 Years parallel stamp. Not bad at all.
Here is the breakdown:
BOSTON RED SOX: 7MINNESOTA TWINS: 5
NEW YORK YANKEES: 4
TORONTO BLUE JAYS: 4
BALTIMORE ORIOLES: 3
CHICAGO CUBS: 3
LOS ANGELES DODGERS: 3
PITTSBURGH PIRATES: 3
ST. LOUIS CARDINALS: 3
ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS: 2
ATLANTA BRAVES: 2
CHICAGO WHITE SOX: 2
CLEVELAND INDIANS: 2
HOUSTON ASTROS: 2
KANSAS CITY ROYALS: 2
MIAMI MARLINS: 2
MILWAUKEE BREWERS: 2
NEW YORK METS: 2
OAKLAND ATHLETICS: 2
TAMPA BAY RAYS: 2
WASHINGTON NATIONALS: 2
COLORADO ROCKIES: 1
DETROIT TIGERS: 1
LOS ANGELES ANGELS: 1
PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES: 1
SAN DIEGO PADRES: 1
SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS: 1
SEATTLE MARINERS: 1
TEXAS RANGERS: 1
CINCINNATI REDS: 0
Not shocking to see Boston way in the lead here.
BOSTON RED SOX: 74
ATLANTA BRAVES: 65
HOUSTON ASTROS: 63
LOS ANGELES ANGELS: 61
CLEVELAND INDIANS: 56
NEW YORK YANKEES: 55
ST. LOUIS CARDINALS: 52
NEW YORK METS: 48
WASHINGTON NATIONALS/MONTREAL EXPOS: 48
CHICAGO CUBS: 47
TAMPA BAY RAYS: 47
TORONTO BLUE JAYS: 45
MILWAUKEE BREWERS: 44
OAKLAND ATHLETICS: 44
PITTSBURGH PIRATES: 44
DETROIT TIGERS: 41
BALTIMORE ORIOLES: 40
KANSAS CITY ROYALS: 39
MINNESOTA TWINS: 39
COLORADO ROCKIES: 38
PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES: 38
SAN DIEGO PADRES: 37
SEATTLE MARINERS: 37
LOS ANGELES DODGERS: 36
MIAMI MARLINS: 35
TEXAS RANGERS: 35
ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS: 34
CHICAGO WHITE SOX: 33
CINCINNATI REDS: 32
SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS: 27
OTHER: 2
And the Red Sox are now way ahead: nine cards ahead of the second-place team. The Braves once held such a lead though, so anything could happen.
Boston should give Leon a big five year extension.
ReplyDelete