Showing posts with label questionable all stars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label questionable all stars. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

Questionable All Stars Pt. 7: Mitch Moreland

The Red Sox in 2018 were an absolute juggernaut.  Winning an outstanding 108 regular season games, and eventually the World Series, requires impressive performances from a number of players on the roster.  It is no surprise then that the team boasted five All Stars.  Included among them were perennial selections Mookie Betts, Chris Sale and Craig Kimbrel and then J.D. Martinez, who was having an outstanding season at the plate.  The team could have even had Xander Bogaerts.  And then there was Mitch Moreland.

First base was not a terribly deep position in 2018, which paved the way for Moreland to be selected as a reserve.  Now, Moreland is a decent hitter, with some power, but at his best, he is hardly a star player.  Moreland was having a decent first half, but was hitting .278/.353/.500 with 11 home runs and 46 RBIs.  But again, those are not exceptional numbers.  His final season line was even less impressive: .245/.325/.433 with 15 home runs and 68 RBIs.  Obviously most of his production came in the first half. 

Moreland has been with the Red Sox for the past three years and will be with the team again this year.  Generally he has produced numbers in line with his final 2018 numbers.  That is a decent player, but is it really an All Star?  Probably not.

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

The Red Sox Solo All Stars

Growing up in the early 1990's, the Boston Red Sox were not real great, so the All Star Game was one of my favorite events of the season.  It was a chance to see some of my favorite players on a national stage.  I am not as thrilled by the All Star Game as I used to be, but I still enjoy watching it.

One of the rules that I always thought was interesting was the rule that said every team had to be represented.  I am not sure if all All Star Games have that rule, but it has always been an aspect that I have enjoyed.  I think it is important so that all fans have someone they can watch.  But it has lead to some bizarre choices at times.  Players like Mark Redman, Derrick Turnbow, Mike Williams, and others have been their teams only representatives and were odd, to say the least.  But not all sole representatives have been that regrettable.  Some have been superstars that have been an All Star many times.  Some have been players having great seasons for bad teams.

I thought it would be interesting to look at the Red Sox players who have been the only All Star for the team that game (some years there were two All Star Games).  I have created four categories for the solo All Star: Superstars who have been frequent All Stars, fan favorites, players having one fantastic season, and players who did not deserve to be All Stars.

SUPERSTARS
These are players who were terrific players and it is not embarrassing at all for them to be the sole Red Sox representative.
David Ortiz (2012)
2012 was a bad year for the Red Sox, as most seasons in which Boston had only one All Star were.  But 2012 was especially bad.  A number of high profile players were not producing, but Ortiz was.  Ortiz of course was one of the best hitters in the game and has been an All Star ten times.  He was on the verge of a terrific season, unfortunately he went down with an injury quickly in the second half.
Manny Ramirez (2001)
Manny came over to the Red Sox as a very high profile free agent prior to the 2001 season.  He had been an All Star with Cleveland four times already.  He would go to eight All Star Games with the Red Sox.  He was really their only choice as Nomar Garciaparra and Pedro Martinez both went down with injuries for most of the year and Jason Varitek broke his elbow the month before, or he might have gone.
Nomar Garciaparra (1997)
It was Nomar's rookie season, but what a rookie season it was.  Nomar had one of the greatest rookie seasons of all time, leading the league in hits and triples while hitting over .300, blasting 30 home runs, and stealing 22 bases.  And all of this from the leadoff spot.  It may have been his rookie year, but it was clear Nomar was a star.  He would picked for five All Star games with the Red Sox, and one with the Dodgers.  Mo Vaughn was injured for a big chunk of the 1997 season and Nomar was the only real choice.
Mo Vaughn (1996)
It is mostly forgotten now, but Mo Vaughn was a huge star at the time.  He was coming off of an MVP season in 1995, and he was possibly even better in 1996, hitting more than 40 home runs for the first time and hitting well over .300.  Vaughn was an All Star three times for Boston, but may have gone to more had first base not been such a loaded position in the American League at the time.

FAN FAVORITES
These are players that are good, occasionally great, but always favorites of the fans.  These players are also not embarrassing.
Dwight Evans (1981)
I believe Evans belongs in the Hall of Fame.  Even so, Evans was not really a superstar, particularly at this point in time, and he was only an All Star three times.  The big Red Sox stars were Carl Yastrzemski and Jim Rice.  Evans was en route to tying for the league lead in home runs and walks.  He was always a good player and was known to hit 20 home runs and win the Gold Glove.  Evans was Boston's best choice that season, but Carney Lansford should have gone, as he was on his way to winning the batting title.
Pete Runnels (1962)
Runnels won the batting title in 1960 and was on his way to winning it in 1962 as well.  He was Boston's sole representative in the second All Star Game of the 1962 season.  The early 1960's were bleak times for Boston.  Ted Williams had already retired and Carl Yastrzemski had not fully developed into a star at the time.  There were not really any better options that season.  Runnels would be an All Star three times as well for Boston.
Bill Monbouquette (1962)
The first All Star game in 1962 did not go much better for Boston as only Monbo was picked.  Monbouquette top starting pitcher in the early 1960's and went to three games for the Red Sox himself.  1962 was not his best year, but he did end up winning 15 games with a 3.33 ERA and pitched a no hitter.  He also lost 13 but that can be more attributed to how bad the team was, rather than an indictment of Monbouquette.
Rick Ferrell (1933-1934)
Yes, Ferrell is in the Hall of Fame, but I will still not go so far as to suggest that he was a superstar player.  Ferrell had been one of the first major acquisitions by Tom Yawkey after taking over the team.  He was picked up during the season from the Browns and was Boston's first All Star, and their only representative in the first two games.  Boston had been very bad for a long time and had no other real choices in 1933.  Billy Werber or brother Wes Ferrell could have joined him in 1934 though.  Ferrell was an All Star four times with the Red Sox and twice with the Senators.

ONE-YEAR WONDER
These players had a terrific season one time, but never again.  Again, this is not an embarrassment.
Don Schwall (1961)
Schwall was the Rookie of the Year in 1961 and was the team's only All Star in the second game of the year.  Schwall would win 15 games that season and have an ERA of 3.22.  Again the early 1960's were kind of a black hole for Boston.  Runnels could have been an All Star again, but there were not really any other choices to join Schwall.

WHAT THE HELL?
These players were only named All Stars because the team needed a representative and the way the roster was constructed led to these players.  It is kind of hard to be excited for these players being your team's All Star.
Brock Holt (2015)
It was some creative thinking that led to Brock Holt being Boston's only All Star in 2015.  Holt is a decent enough player, and I really like him, but he is at his best when he is a utility player.  He is a contact hitter that can play a number of positions.  And that is why he was selected.  Ned Yost, manager of the All Star Game, had to pick a Red Sox player and picked Holt for his versatility.  He ended up playing in the outfield in the game.  David Ortiz would have been a more reasonable selection.
Scott Cooper (1993-1994)
I have said before that Scott Cooper is one of the worst players to be named to the All Star Game multiple times.  Cooper was picked by Cito Gaston to be Boston's sole representative in both seasons and it had more to do with a lack of third base options than anything.  In both seasons Mo Vaughn would have been a better selection.  Boston also had decent seasons from Danny Darwin and John Valentin in those years.  Cooper was no more than an average hitter, hitting around .280 both seasons.  His power picked up a little in 1994 as he hit 13 home runs that season, as opposed to 9 in 1993.
Mike Fornieles (1961)
And finally we have yet another solo All Star from one of two games in the early 1960's.  Mike Fornieles had a terrific season as a reliever in 1960, but he was not nearly as good in 1961.  He saved 15 games but had a record of 9-8 and an ERA that ballooned more than two full runs from what it was the previous season.  Relievers frequently appear as the solo All Star for teams.  This was the only year that that happened to Boston.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Questionable All Stars Pt. 6: Shea Hillenbrand

The All Star selection process is such a subjective procedure that sometimes deserving players get left off. Then there are times when players who do not deserve to be All Stars are named to the team.

SHEA HILLENBRAND
Shea Hillenbrand was elected to start the All Star game in just his second season. Hillenbrand was a serviceable player and had some power, but he seemed allergic to taking a walk, which drove down his value significantly. 2002 was one of his better years, but to say that he deserved to start the All Star game is another story entirely.

In the first half of the 2002 season, Hillenbrand hit .298/.331/.490/.821 with 13 home runs. Certainly decent numbers, and he probably deserved to be an All Star, but not good enough to start. 2002 was a bad year for third basemen though. The real problem was that Hillenbrand only walked 11 times in that first half. In 370 plate appearances. His inability to occasionally get on base other than hitting was what eventually led the Red Sox to trade him, because he did not hit nearly often enough to make up for not getting on base.

At the end of the year, Hillenbrand's numbers were .293/.330/.459/.789 with 18 home runs and 25 walks. The next year, he was traded to Arizona for Byung-Hyun Kim and Bill Mueller took over at third base and won the batting title.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Questionable All Stars Pt. 5: Jason Varitek

The All Star selection process is such a subjective procedure that sometimes deserving players get left off. Then there are times when players who do not deserve to be All Stars are named to the team.
JASON VARITEK
I hate doing this one because Varitek is my favorite player. Varitek has been a deserving All Star in the past. He deserved to be an All Star in 2003 and 2005 when he was selected. I would argue that he may have deserved it in 1999, 2004, and 2007 as well. However, Varitek did not deserve the honor in 2008, and that is why I am writing this blog.

Varitek hit .220/.313/.359/.672 in 2008. He hit 13 home runs and drove in 43. Those are not All Star numbers, even considering his position. And it is not as if he slumped badly in the second half. Varitek's first half numbers were .218/.299/.354/.653. He actually started hitting better in the second half. So no, Varitek was not a good selection to the All Star game in 2008. But he did deserve it in other years.

Monday, November 15, 2010

Questionable All Stars Pt. 4: Mark Loretta

The All Star selection process is such a subjective procedure that sometimes deserving players get left off. Then there are times when players who do not deserve to be All Stars are named to the team.

MARK LORETTA
In 2006, new Red Sox second-baseman Mark Loretta was elected to start the All Star game over Yankees Robinson Cano. Loretta was a fairly normal everyday middle infielder, who could hit for contact but not much else. His season line was .285/.345/.361/.706. He hit five home runs and drove in 59.

In the first half, Loretta was hitting .305/.353/.385/.738. He was certainly playing better in the first half. He also played good defense and had some clutch hits, which probably helped his case.

At the end of the year though, it's pretty weird to look at his stats and realize that he started the All Star game. It was mostly due to his team. Had to be.

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Questonable All Stars Pt. 3: Gerry Moses

The All Star selection process is such a subjective procedure that sometimes deserving players get left off. Then there are times when players who do not deserve to be All Stars are named to the team.

GERRY MOSES
I promised yesterday that I would do something on this player. When I first discovered that he was an All Star in 1970, I was pretty surprised. I have done quite a bit of research, and I still cannot explain it.

Gerry Moses played in 92 games for the Red Sox in 1970. His final slash line was .263/.313/.384/.697. He hit 18 doubles, 1 triple, and 6 home runs. He drove in 35 runs and walked 21 times compared to 45 strikeouts. So, the final statistics are not all that impressive.

So, what about his first half stats? His slash line was .278/.316/.394/.710. He had three home runs, 23 RBIs 14 doubles, and his only triple. So, it is true that the greater amount of his production was in the first half.

This was Moses's only All Star appearance, and the only time he played a majority of the season. Moses did not play in the game, even after Pete Rose ran over catcher Ray Fosse.

But, let's look at the other American League catchers that year,except the Tigers' Bill Freehan and the Indians' Ray Fosse as they were All Stars, and their slash lines:
BAL Elrod Hendricks .242/.317/.382/.699
CAL Joe Azcue .242/.292/.302/.594
CHW Ed Herrman .283/.356/.505/.861
KCR Ed Kirkpatrick .229/.319/.406/.725
MIL Phil Roof .227/.306/.377/.683
MIN George Mitterwald .222/.291/.388/679
NYY Thurman Munson .302/.386/.415/.801
OAK Frank Fernandez .214/.327/.413/.740
WAS Paul Casanova .229/.251/.354/.605

Pretty weak year for catchers, but Munson, Herrman, Kirkpatrick, and Fernandez were each much more deserving candidates for the All Star game that year.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Questionable All Stars Pt. 2: Jose Offerman

The All Star selection process is such a subjective procedure that sometimes deserving players get left off. Then there are times when players who do not deserve to be All Stars are named to the team.

JOSE OFFERMAN
The Red Sox made a controversial decision prior to the 1999 season. They were not able to bring Mo Vaughn back and then-GM Dan Duquette decided to replace him with light-hitting Jose Offerman. Offerman was coming off a season for the Royals in which he hit .315/.403/.438, lead the league in triples, and stole 45 bases. It was certainly a good year for Offerman, although he was a defensive liability at second base.

Duquette signed Offerman to an insane four-year contract worth around seven million a year. He was lambasted in the press for the contract. Offerman started off the 1999 season scorching hot though, hitting .330/.405/.497 at the end of May. He slumped in June and July though and was at .273/.352/.402 at the All Star break. Based almost completely on his first two months of play, Offerman was named to the All Star team as a reserve second-baseman.

Offerman would go on to a season line of .294/.391/.435, certainly decent numbers. He was a good leadoff hitter, drawing 96 walks against 79 strikeouts. He also hit eight home runs and stole 18 bases. He was caught stealing 12 times and his defensive numbers were once again terrible though. Offerman was a good player in 1999, but it is hard to make the argument that he deserved to be an All Star. The fact that he played second base for a well-regarded team certainly helped him. It is also important to remember that Offerman was an All Star before, in 1995 with the Dodgers.

Offerman remained with Boston into the 2002 season, but he was never nearly as good at the plate as he was in 1999. His defensive numbers did improve, but that was mostly due to playing increasingly at first base. However, his bat was incredibly anemic for a first-baseman, so he became increasingly useless. He also mysteriously stopped stealing bases, stealing zero in 2000, five in 2001, and eight in 2002 before he was finally sent out of town.

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Questionable All Stars Pt. 1: Scott Cooper

The All Star selection process is such a subjective procedure that sometimes deserving players get left off. Then there are times when players who do not deserve to be All Stars are named to the team.

SCOTT COOPER
Scott Cooper has to be one of the worst players to be an All Star. And, he was an All Star twice. He was Boston's sole representative in both 1993 and 1994. The All Star game has a rule that every team must be represented. But that does not even explain the whole story for why Cooper was an All Star those years.

It's not as if Boston had no other options. Mo Vaughn was becoming one of the best first-basemen in the game in 1993 and 1994. John Valentin was looking like a good young player, particularly in 1994. Danny Darwin had a great year in 1993 and Roger Clemens did in 1994. Even Frank Viola and Mike Greenwell would have been decent options. But Cooper got in because there were not many deserving third-basemen and Boston needed a representative. So, Toronto manager Cito Gaston who got to fill in the reserves and pitching staff selected Scott Cooper both years.

Scott Cooper was not even an average player either year. In 1993, he had a slash line of .279/.355/.397 with nine home runs and 63 RBIs. He was a little better in the first half going .282/.362/.401 with six home runs and 36 RBIs. Cooper was never known as a great defensive third-baseman, although he had a terrific arm. He made a lot of errors, but that may have been more due to Mo Vaughn's questionable defensive talents than Cooper's.

In 1994, his batting average increased to .282, his slugging to .453 and his home runs increased to 13 in the strike-shortened season, but his OBP dropped all the way to .333, not a good number. He did most of this in the first half and again slumped terribly in the second half.

Cooper was never a deserving All Star, but his numbers do look a little better when focusing on the first half of each season.